
In the previous episode, we had witnessed Sanjaya conveying King Dhritarashtra’s message in a straightforward and a clear fashion. Even though King Dhritarashtra did not express his intention fully to Sanjaya and left it to Sanjaya to make his own interpretations, Sanjaya was extremely clear in his interpretation of what exactly King Dhritarashtra had in his mind! He expressed in clear words to Yudishtra and Co. that King Dhritarashtra doesn’t want to give the kingdom to Yudishtra and he wants his son Duryodhana to rule it fully. Even though King Dhritarashtra doesn’t prefer a war to happen, his opinion is that, Yudishtra should continue his same status quo and Duryodhana should be let to rule the kingdom. In other words, Yudishtra should make a compromise in favour of Duryodhana, so that the feud comes to an end! Now we’ve to see whether this formula is acceptable for Yudishtra and Co. or not. Let us continue the discussion from this point onwards in today’s episode.
Moving on thus, we’ve already seen that Yudishtra isn’t alone there. Around Yudishtra, there is the king of Viraata Desha, Saatyaki, etc. along with Bhagawan Krishna. As Sanjaya finishes his accord, Saatyaki put forth a question from this side as a starter. He asks Sanjaya thus, “Oh Sanjaya! I know you are doing the job of a messenger now. However, you are a great scholar. You tell me from the lens of a scholar – Is King Dhritarashtra right in conveying such a message to Yudishtra? Does he even have the basic maturity to understand what is right and what is wrong? How can Yudishtra keep compromising every time, just because “Dharma” is on his side? He has been telling this narrative for the past thirteen years during the “Vana-Vaasam”. But now it is over! Now the “Dharma” for Yudishtra is to rule the Indraprastha kingdom and not to keep sacrificing the throne everytime for Duryodhana who has wicked intentions. Why is King Dhritarashtra not understanding this?”
As Saatyaki asks thus, Sanjaya replies – “Oh Saatyaki! Whatever you’re saying is correct! However, when it comes to such a situation, there is no “right” or “wrong”. It is the question of “Dharma” vs. “Adharma”. What might be right from him might not be right for me. Similarly, what might be wrong for him might not be wrong for me. Hence, the definition of right and wrong keeps changing from person to person and is very subjective in nature. However, when it comes to “Dharma”, it is the same for everyone and it doesn’t change with people and their definitions of right and wrong. Now let us see what is “Dharma” here. The “Dharma” in this context of whatever King Dhritarashtra says is that, if there is a war, there will be huge bloodshed and many people will lose their lives. Because of this, many families will get affected and will not be able to conduct their livelihood. Hence, the suggestion to go for a compromise is “Dharma” here. However, you might ask me another question here – Just because avoiding war is “Dharma”, should I keep on sacrificing everytime? Why are those people not being questioned on “Dharma” at all? This question can be asked to Duryodhana isn’t it? If the war should be avoided (“Dharma”), why doesn’t he give the Indrapastha kingdom to me? My answer to this is very simple – We can talk about “Dharma” only to those who will understand what it is, isn’t it? What is the use of going to Duryodhana and talking about “Dharma” to him? It makes sense only for people like you who meticulously follow “Dharma”. Here, avoiding war is “Dharma” and hence, if you’re ready to make a sacrifice for Duryodhana, war can still be avoided!”
Saying thus, Sanjaya answers Saatyaki’s question and now the debate becomes even bigger! Is Sanjaya’s answer acceptable to the others in Yudishtra’s camp? Let us wait till the next episode to witness what others opined on this! Stay tuned! 🙂
